Description: "Database containing parcel boundary, parcel identifier, parcel address, owner type, and county recorder contact information" - HB113. The intent of the bill was to not include any attributes that the counties rely on for data sales. If you want other attributes associated with the parcels you need to contact the county recorder.Users should be aware the owner type field 'OWN_TYPE' in the parcel polygons is a very generalized ownership type (Federal, Private, State, Tribal). It is populated with the value of the 'OWNER' field where the parcel's centroid intersects the CADASTRE.LandOwnership polygon layer.This dataset is a snapshot in time and may not be the most current. For the most current data contact the county recorder.Last Update: July, 2018
{"renderer":{"type":"uniqueValue","field1":"GC_Zoning","field2":null,"field3":null,"defaultSymbol":null,"defaultLabel":null,"uniqueValueInfos":[{"symbol":{"type":"esriSFS","style":"esriSFSSolid","color":[225,225,225,255],"outline":{"type":"esriSLS","style":"esriSLSSolid","color":[255,255,255,255],"width":0.4}},"value":"","label":"Unknown","description":""},{"symbol":{"type":"esriSFS","style":"esriSFSSolid","color":[255,255,115,255],"outline":{"type":"esriSLS","style":"esriSLSSolid","color":[255,255,255,255],"width":0.4}},"value":"Agriculture","label":"Agriculture","description":""},{"symbol":{"type":"esriSFS","style":"esriSFSSolid","color":[223,115,255,255],"outline":{"type":"esriSLS","style":"esriSLSSolid","color":[255,255,255,255],"width":0.4}},"value":"Commercial","label":"Commercial","description":""},{"symbol":{"type":"esriSFS","style":"esriSFSSolid","color":[255,170,0,255],"outline":{"type":"esriSLS","style":"esriSLSSolid","color":[255,255,255,255],"width":0.4}},"value":"Mining and Grazing","label":"Mining and Grazing","description":""},{"symbol":{"type":"esriSFS","style":"esriSFSSolid","color":[85,255,0,255],"outline":{"type":"esriSLS","style":"esriSLSSolid","color":[255,255,255,255],"width":0.4}},"value":"Open Space","label":"Open Space","description":""},{"symbol":{"type":"esriSFS","style":"esriSFSSolid","color":[215,176,158,255],"outline":{"type":"esriSLS","style":"esriSLSSolid","color":[255,255,255,255],"width":0.4}},"value":"Residential","label":"Residential","description":""}],"fieldDelimiter":","},"transparency":0,"labelingInfo":null}
HasZ: false
HasM: false
Has Attachments: false
Has Geometry Properties: true
HTML Popup Type: esriServerHTMLPopupTypeAsHTMLText
Description: "Database containing parcel boundary, parcel identifier, parcel address, owner type, and county recorder contact information" - HB113. The intent of the bill was to not include any attributes that the counties rely on for data sales. If you want other attributes associated with the parcels you need to contact the county recorder.Users should be aware the owner type field 'OWN_TYPE' in the parcel polygons is a very generalized ownership type (Federal, Private, State, Tribal). It is populated with the value of the 'OWNER' field where the parcel's centroid intersects the CADASTRE.LandOwnership polygon layer.This dataset is a snapshot in time and may not be the most current. For the most current data contact the county recorder.Last Update: September, 2018
Description: "Database containing parcel boundary, parcel identifier, parcel address, owner type, and county recorder contact information" - HB113. The intent of the bill was to not include any attributes that the counties rely on for data sales. If you want other attributes associated with the parcels you need to contact the county recorder.Users should be aware the owner type field 'OWN_TYPE' in the parcel polygons is a very generalized ownership type (Federal, Private, State, Tribal). It is populated with the value of the 'OWNER' field where the parcel's centroid intersects the CADASTRE.LandOwnership polygon layer.This dataset is a snapshot in time and may not be the most current. For the most current data contact the county recorder.Last Update: July, 2015
{"renderer":{"type":"uniqueValue","field1":"GC_Zoning","field2":null,"field3":null,"defaultSymbol":null,"defaultLabel":null,"uniqueValueInfos":[{"symbol":{"type":"esriSFS","style":"esriSFSSolid","color":[255,255,115,255],"outline":{"type":"esriSLS","style":"esriSLSSolid","color":[255,255,255,255],"width":0.4}},"value":"Agriculture","label":"Agriculture","description":""},{"symbol":{"type":"esriSFS","style":"esriSFSSolid","color":[223,115,255,255],"outline":{"type":"esriSLS","style":"esriSLSSolid","color":[255,255,255,255],"width":0.4}},"value":"Commercial","label":"Commercial","description":""},{"symbol":{"type":"esriSFS","style":"esriSFSSolid","color":[168,0,132,255],"outline":{"type":"esriSLS","style":"esriSLSSolid","color":[255,255,255,255],"width":0.4}},"value":"Industrial","label":"Industrial","description":""},{"symbol":{"type":"esriSFS","style":"esriSFSSolid","color":[255,170,0,255],"outline":{"type":"esriSLS","style":"esriSLSSolid","color":[255,255,255,255],"width":0.4}},"value":"Mining and Grazing","label":"Mining and Grazing","description":""}],"fieldDelimiter":","},"transparency":0,"labelingInfo":null}
HasZ: false
HasM: false
Has Attachments: false
Has Geometry Properties: true
HTML Popup Type: esriServerHTMLPopupTypeAsHTMLText
Description: This data set represents the extent, approximate location and type of wetlands and deepwater habitats in the United States and its Territories. These data delineate the areal extent of wetlands and surface waters as defined by Cowardin et al. (1979). The National Wetlands Inventory - Version 2, Surface Waters and Wetlands Inventory was derived by retaining the wetland and deepwater polygons that compose the NWI digital wetlands spatial data layer and reintroducing any linear wetland or surface water features that were orphaned from the original NWI hard copy maps by converting them to narrow polygonal features. Additionally, the data are supplemented with hydrography data, buffered to become polygonal features, as a secondary source for any single-line stream features not mapped by the NWI and to complete segmented connections. Wetland mapping conducted in WA, OR, CA, NV and ID after 2012 and most other projects mapped after 2015 were mapped to include all surface water features and are not derived data. The linear hydrography dataset used to derive Version 2 was the U.S. Geological Survey's National Hydrography Dataset (NHD). Specific information on the NHD version used to derive Version 2 and where Version 2 was mapped can be found in the 'comments' field of the Wetlands_Project_Metadata feature class. Certain wetland habitats are excluded from the National mapping program because of the limitations of aerial imagery as the primary data source used to detect wetlands. These habitats include seagrasses or submerged aquatic vegetation that are found in the intertidal and subtidal zones of estuaries and near shore coastal waters. Some deepwater reef communities (coral or tuberficid worm reefs) have also been excluded from the inventory. These habitats, because of their depth, go undetected by aerial imagery. By policy, the Service also excludes certain types of "farmed wetlands" as may be defined by the Food Security Act or that do not coincide with the Cowardin et al. definition. Contact the Service's Regional Wetland Coordinator for additional information on what types of farmed wetlands are included on wetland maps. This dataset should be used in conjunction with the Wetlands_Project_Metadata layer, which contains project specific wetlands mapping procedures and information on dates, scales and emulsion of imagery used to map the wetlands within specific project boundaries.
{"renderer":{"type":"uniqueValue","field1":"BOOK_NAME","field2":null,"field3":null,"defaultSymbol":null,"defaultLabel":null,"uniqueValueInfos":[{"symbol":{"type":"esriSFS","style":"esriSFSSolid","color":[169,0,230,255],"outline":{"type":"esriSLS","style":"esriSLSSolid","color":[110,110,110,255],"width":0.4}},"value":"ASHLEY DIV. BRUSH CREEK SUBD.","label":"ASHLEY DIV. BRUSH CREEK SUBD.","description":""},{"symbol":{"type":"esriSFS","style":"esriSFSSolid","color":[255,211,127,255],"outline":{"type":"esriSLS","style":"esriSLSSolid","color":[110,110,110,255],"width":0.4}},"value":"BOOK 3","label":"BOOK 3","description":""},{"symbol":{"type":"esriSFS","style":"esriSFSSolid","color":[255,190,232,255],"outline":{"type":"esriSLS","style":"esriSLSSolid","color":[110,110,110,255],"width":0.4}},"value":"BOOK 8 - ASHLEY UPPER HIGHLINE SOUTH","label":"BOOK 8 - ASHLEY UPPER HIGHLINE SOUTH","description":""},{"symbol":{"type":"esriSFS","style":"esriSFSSolid","color":[168,112,0,255],"outline":{"type":"esriSLS","style":"esriSLSSolid","color":[110,110,110,255],"width":0.4}},"value":"BOULDER SUBDIVISION","label":"BOULDER SUBDIVISION","description":""},{"symbol":{"type":"esriSFS","style":"esriSFSSolid","color":[122,182,245,255],"outline":{"type":"esriSLS","style":"esriSLSSolid","color":[110,110,110,255],"width":0.4}},"value":"CASTLE CREEK BOOK 1","label":"CASTLE CREEK BOOK 1","description":""},{"symbol":{"type":"esriSFS","style":"esriSFSSolid","color":[255,127,127,255],"outline":{"type":"esriSLS","style":"esriSLSSolid","color":[110,110,110,255],"width":0.4}},"value":"DIAMOND MOUNTAIN SUBDIVISION","label":"DIAMOND MOUNTAIN SUBDIVISION","description":""},{"symbol":{"type":"esriSFS","style":"esriSFSSolid","color":[165,245,122,255],"outline":{"type":"esriSLS","style":"esriSLSSolid","color":[110,110,110,255],"width":0.4}},"value":"ESCALANTE DIVISION","label":"ESCALANTE DIVISION","description":""},{"symbol":{"type":"esriSFS","style":"esriSFSSolid","color":[194,158,215,255],"outline":{"type":"esriSLS","style":"esriSLSSolid","color":[110,110,110,255],"width":0.4}},"value":"LISBON VALLEY BOOK 5","label":"LISBON VALLEY BOOK 5","description":""},{"symbol":{"type":"esriSFS","style":"esriSFSSolid","color":[255,0,197,255],"outline":{"type":"esriSLS","style":"esriSLSSolid","color":[110,110,110,255],"width":0.4}},"value":"LOWER DIRTY DEVIL BOOK 3","label":"LOWER DIRTY DEVIL BOOK 3","description":""},{"symbol":{"type":"esriSFS","style":"esriSFSSolid","color":[255,255,0,255],"outline":{"type":"esriSLS","style":"esriSLSSolid","color":[110,110,110,255],"width":0.4}},"value":"LOWER GREEN RIVER DIV BOOK 7","label":"LOWER GREEN RIVER DIV BOOK 7","description":""},{"symbol":{"type":"esriSFS","style":"esriSFSSolid","color":[76,230,0,255],"outline":{"type":"esriSLS","style":"esriSLSSolid","color":[110,110,110,255],"width":0.4}},"value":"LOWER SAN RAFAEL RIVER BOOK 2","label":"LOWER SAN RAFAEL RIVER BOOK 2","description":""},{"symbol":{"type":"esriSFS","style":"esriSFSSolid","color":[76,0,115,255],"outline":{"type":"esriSLS","style":"esriSLSSolid","color":[110,110,110,255],"width":0.4}},"value":"MILL CREEK BOOK 2","label":"MILL CREEK BOOK 2","description":""},{"symbol":{"type":"esriSFS","style":"esriSFSSolid","color":[255,0,0,255],"outline":{"type":"esriSLS","style":"esriSLSSolid","color":[110,110,110,255],"width":0.4}},"value":"NINE MILE DIV BOOK 2","label":"NINE MILE DIV BOOK 2","description":""},{"symbol":{"type":"esriSFS","style":"esriSFSSolid","color":[255,170,0,255],"outline":{"type":"esriSLS","style":"esriSLSSolid","color":[110,110,110,255],"width":0.4}},"value":"NORTHWEST COLORADO DIV BOOK 1","label":"NORTHWEST COLORADO DIV BOOK 1","description":""},{"symbol":{"type":"esriSFS","style":"esriSFSSolid","color":[255,255,255,255],"outline":{"type":"esriSLS","style":"esriSLSSolid","color":[110,110,110,255],"width":0.4}},"value":"No Book Name","label":"No Book Name","description":""},{"symbol":{"type":"esriSFS","style":"esriSFSSolid","color":[0,255,197,255],"outline":{"type":"esriSLS","style":"esriSLSSolid","color":[110,110,110,255],"width":0.4}},"value":"OOK 2 TWELVE MILE WASH","label":"OOK 2 TWELVE MILE WASH","description":""},{"symbol":{"type":"esriSFS","style":"esriSFSSolid","color":[0,112,255,255],"outline":{"type":"esriSLS","style":"esriSLSSolid","color":[110,110,110,255],"width":0.4}},"value":"PARIA RIVER","label":"PARIA RIVER","description":""},{"symbol":{"type":"esriSFS","style":"esriSFSSolid","color":[38,115,0,255],"outline":{"type":"esriSLS","style":"esriSLSSolid","color":[110,110,110,255],"width":0.4}},"value":"PRICE RIVER BOOK 5","label":"PRICE RIVER BOOK 5","description":""}],"fieldDelimiter":","},"transparency":0,"labelingInfo":null}
HasZ: false
HasM: false
Has Attachments: false
Has Geometry Properties: true
HTML Popup Type: esriServerHTMLPopupTypeAsHTMLText
Name: Oil and Gas Refineries and Processing Plants
Display Field: PLANT_NAME
Type: Feature Layer
Geometry Type: esriGeometryPoint
Description: This digital dataset presents the oil and gas fields of Utah at a 1:700,000 scale. The Uinta and Paradox Basins in eastern and southeastern Utah, respectively, produce the majority of the hydrocarbons in the state. The map also shows major basins and uplifts, national parks, monuments, and recreation areas, township and range, counties, major cities, major roads, major water bodies, Precambrian rocks, Tertiary and Quaternary volcanic rocks and intrusions, the eastern extent of Sevier orogenic thrusting, and pipelines. The oil and gas field polygons are colored by the age of the major producing reservoir. Field names are colored by commodity produced (red for gas, green for oil, and purple for CO2). Beneath each field label are listed the producing reservoir rocks, field designations, and reservoir designations. Any designations listed after reservoirs are applicable only to the afore-written reservoir. For example, the Lodgepole field polygon in Summit County is colored green for Jurassic, and the field label is also green, designating an oil field. Beneath the name “Lodgepole” is listed “(D) (HD) Jtc, Jn (A)” and from this we understand Lodgepole field has a produced water disposal project and horizontal drilling, is currently producing from the Jurassic Twin Creek Limestone and used to produce from the now-abandoned Jurassic Nugget Sandstone. The oil and gas pipelines are colored according to the products they transport (green for crude oil, red for natural gas, purple for CO2, and brown for refined products). Labels along the pipeline have an acronym referring the current operator, the diameter of the line, and direction of flow. This CD contains geographic information system (GIS) fields in an Environmental Systems Research Institute (Esri) file geodatabase and shapefile formats. A Portable Document Format (PDF) of the map is also included and requires Adobe Reader to view which can be downloaded at www.adobe.com. Specialized GIS software is required to use the GIS files.
Copyright Text: Utah Automated Geographic Reference Center (AGRC) http://agrc.utah.gov/
Plains All American Pipeline, LP
Bon, R.L., 1999, Petroleum geology of the Harley Dome field, Grand County, Utah: Utah Geological Survey Oil and Gas Field Studies 21, 2 plates.
Chidsey, T.C., Jr., Wakefield, S., Hill, B.G., and Hebertson, M., 2005, Oil and gas fields map of Utah: Utah Geological Survey Map 203DM, scale 1:700,000.
Fassett, J.E., editor, 1978, Oil and gas fields of the Four Corners area: Four Corners Geological Society, v. 2, p. 169–724.
Fassett, J.E., editor, 1983, Oil and gas fields of the Four Corners area: Four Corners Geological Society, v. 3, p. 1061–1140.
Gurgel, K.D., 1983, Energy resources map of Utah: Utah Geological and Mineral Survey Map 68, scale 1:500,000.
Hill, B.G., and Bereskin, S.R., editors, 1993, Oil and gas fields of Utah: Utah Geological Association Publication 22, non-paginated.
Hill, B.G., and Bereskin, S.R., editors, 1996, Oil and gas fields of Utah: Utah Geological Association Publication 22 (Addendum), non-paginated.
Hintze, L.F., Willis, G.C., Laes, D.Y.M., Sprinkel, D.A., and Brown, K.D., 2000, Digital geologic map of Utah: Utah Geological Survey Map 179DM, scale 1:500,000.
Hjellming, C.A., editor, 1993, Atlas of major Rocky Mountain gas reservoirs: New Mexico Bureau of Mines and Mineral Resources, 206 p., 10 plates.
Morgan, C.D., 1999, Petroleum geology of the Cisco Dome area, Grand County, Utah: Utah Geological Survey Oil and Gas Field Studies 19, 4 plates.
Morgan, C.D., 1999, Petroleum geology of the Cisco Townsite and Cisco Wash areas, Grand County, Utah: Utah Geological Survey Oil and Gas Field Studies 22, 2 plates.
Morgan, C.D., 2001, Petroleum geology of the Agate, Danish Wash, Sage, and Sieber Nose reservoirs in the Greater Cisco field, Grand County, Utah: Utah Geological Survey Oil and Gas Field Studies 23, 2 plates.
Morgan, C.D., 2005, Clay Basin gas field, Daggett County, Utah, in Dehler, C.M., Pederson, J.L., Sprinkel, D.A., and Kowallis, B.J., editors, Uinta Mountains geology: Utah Geological Association Publication 33, p. 337–345.
Morgan, C.D., 2007, Structure, reservoir characterization, and carbon dioxide resources of Farnham Dome field, Carbon County, Utah, in Willis, G.C., Hylland, M.D., Clark, D.L., and Chidsey, T.C., Jr., editors, Central Utah — diverse geology of a dynamic landscape: Utah Geological Association Publication 36, p. 297–310.
Preston, D., editor, 1961, Oil and gas fields of Utah: Intermountain Association of Petroleum Geologists, non-paginated.
Stewart, W.W., 1979, Clay Basin, Daggett County, Utah: Wyoming Geological Association, Oil and Gas Fields Symposium, Greater Green River Basin, p. 100–101.
Stowe, C., 1972, Oil and gas production in Utah to 1970: Utah Geological and Mineral Survey Bulletin 94, 179 p.
Utah Division of Oil, Gas, and Mining, 2015, Oil and gas well logs: Online, http://oilgas.ogm.utah.gov/Data_Center/LiveData_Search/well_data_lookup.cfm, accessed March 2015.
Utah Division of Oil, Gas, and Mining, 2015, Oil and gas production data by field: Online, https://oilgas.ogm.utah.gov/pub/Publications/Reports/Prod/Field/Fld_Dec_2014.pdf, accessed March 2015.
Utah Division of Oil, Gas, and Mining, 2015, Oil and gas production data by well: Online, https://oilgas.ogm.utah.gov/pub/Publications/Reports/Prod/Well/Wel_Dec_2014.pdf, accessed March 2015.
Utah Geological Survey, 2013, Utah oil and gas — a rich history, a powerful future: Utah Geological Survey Public Information Series 71, 21 p.
Vanden Berg, M.D., 2014, Utah’s energy landscape: Utah Geological Survey Circular 117, 45 p.
Westerdale, B., 1979, Bridger Lake, Summit County, Utah: Wyoming Geological Association, Oil and Gas Fields Symposium, Greater Green River Basin, p. 72–73.
Review: Michael Vanden Berg, Grant Willis, David Tabet, Michael Hylland, Kimm Harty, and Rick Allis (all with Utah Geological Survey), and Bradley Hill, Dayne Doucet, Don Staley, Dustin Doucet, Joshua Payne (all with Utah Division of Oil, Gas, and Mining).
Publication Review: Vicky Clarke and Jay Hill (Utah Geological Survey)
Description: This digital dataset presents the oil and gas fields of Utah at a 1:700,000 scale. The Uinta and Paradox Basins in eastern and southeastern Utah, respectively, produce the majority of the hydrocarbons in the state. The map also shows major basins and uplifts, national parks, monuments, and recreation areas, township and range, counties, major cities, major roads, major water bodies, Precambrian rocks, Tertiary and Quaternary volcanic rocks and intrusions, the eastern extent of Sevier orogenic thrusting, and pipelines. The oil and gas field polygons are colored by the age of the major producing reservoir. Field names are colored by commodity produced (red for gas, green for oil, and purple for CO2). Beneath each field label are listed the producing reservoir rocks, field designations, and reservoir designations. Any designations listed after reservoirs are applicable only to the afore-written reservoir. For example, the Lodgepole field polygon in Summit County is colored green for Jurassic, and the field label is also green, designating an oil field. Beneath the name “Lodgepole” is listed “(D) (HD) Jtc, Jn (A)” and from this we understand Lodgepole field has a produced water disposal project and horizontal drilling, is currently producing from the Jurassic Twin Creek Limestone and used to produce from the now-abandoned Jurassic Nugget Sandstone. The oil and gas pipelines are colored according to the products they transport (green for crude oil, red for natural gas, purple for CO2, and brown for refined products). Labels along the pipeline have an acronym referring the current operator, the diameter of the line, and direction of flow. This CD contains geographic information system (GIS) fields in an Environmental Systems Research Institute (Esri) file geodatabase and shapefile formats. A Portable Document Format (PDF) of the map is also included and requires Adobe Reader to view which can be downloaded at www.adobe.com. Specialized GIS software is required to use the GIS files.
Copyright Text: Utah Automated Geographic Reference Center (AGRC) http://agrc.utah.gov/
Plains All American Pipeline, LP
Bon, R.L., 1999, Petroleum geology of the Harley Dome field, Grand County, Utah: Utah Geological Survey Oil and Gas Field Studies 21, 2 plates.
Chidsey, T.C., Jr., Wakefield, S., Hill, B.G., and Hebertson, M., 2005, Oil and gas fields map of Utah: Utah Geological Survey Map 203DM, scale 1:700,000.
Fassett, J.E., editor, 1978, Oil and gas fields of the Four Corners area: Four Corners Geological Society, v. 2, p. 169–724.
Fassett, J.E., editor, 1983, Oil and gas fields of the Four Corners area: Four Corners Geological Society, v. 3, p. 1061–1140.
Gurgel, K.D., 1983, Energy resources map of Utah: Utah Geological and Mineral Survey Map 68, scale 1:500,000.
Hill, B.G., and Bereskin, S.R., editors, 1993, Oil and gas fields of Utah: Utah Geological Association Publication 22, non-paginated.
Hill, B.G., and Bereskin, S.R., editors, 1996, Oil and gas fields of Utah: Utah Geological Association Publication 22 (Addendum), non-paginated.
Hintze, L.F., Willis, G.C., Laes, D.Y.M., Sprinkel, D.A., and Brown, K.D., 2000, Digital geologic map of Utah: Utah Geological Survey Map 179DM, scale 1:500,000.
Hjellming, C.A., editor, 1993, Atlas of major Rocky Mountain gas reservoirs: New Mexico Bureau of Mines and Mineral Resources, 206 p., 10 plates.
Morgan, C.D., 1999, Petroleum geology of the Cisco Dome area, Grand County, Utah: Utah Geological Survey Oil and Gas Field Studies 19, 4 plates.
Morgan, C.D., 1999, Petroleum geology of the Cisco Townsite and Cisco Wash areas, Grand County, Utah: Utah Geological Survey Oil and Gas Field Studies 22, 2 plates.
Morgan, C.D., 2001, Petroleum geology of the Agate, Danish Wash, Sage, and Sieber Nose reservoirs in the Greater Cisco field, Grand County, Utah: Utah Geological Survey Oil and Gas Field Studies 23, 2 plates.
Morgan, C.D., 2005, Clay Basin gas field, Daggett County, Utah, in Dehler, C.M., Pederson, J.L., Sprinkel, D.A., and Kowallis, B.J., editors, Uinta Mountains geology: Utah Geological Association Publication 33, p. 337–345.
Morgan, C.D., 2007, Structure, reservoir characterization, and carbon dioxide resources of Farnham Dome field, Carbon County, Utah, in Willis, G.C., Hylland, M.D., Clark, D.L., and Chidsey, T.C., Jr., editors, Central Utah — diverse geology of a dynamic landscape: Utah Geological Association Publication 36, p. 297–310.
Preston, D., editor, 1961, Oil and gas fields of Utah: Intermountain Association of Petroleum Geologists, non-paginated.
Stewart, W.W., 1979, Clay Basin, Daggett County, Utah: Wyoming Geological Association, Oil and Gas Fields Symposium, Greater Green River Basin, p. 100–101.
Stowe, C., 1972, Oil and gas production in Utah to 1970: Utah Geological and Mineral Survey Bulletin 94, 179 p.
Utah Division of Oil, Gas, and Mining, 2015, Oil and gas well logs: Online, http://oilgas.ogm.utah.gov/Data_Center/LiveData_Search/well_data_lookup.cfm, accessed March 2015.
Utah Division of Oil, Gas, and Mining, 2015, Oil and gas production data by field: Online, https://oilgas.ogm.utah.gov/pub/Publications/Reports/Prod/Field/Fld_Dec_2014.pdf, accessed March 2015.
Utah Division of Oil, Gas, and Mining, 2015, Oil and gas production data by well: Online, https://oilgas.ogm.utah.gov/pub/Publications/Reports/Prod/Well/Wel_Dec_2014.pdf, accessed March 2015.
Utah Geological Survey, 2013, Utah oil and gas — a rich history, a powerful future: Utah Geological Survey Public Information Series 71, 21 p.
Vanden Berg, M.D., 2014, Utah’s energy landscape: Utah Geological Survey Circular 117, 45 p.
Westerdale, B., 1979, Bridger Lake, Summit County, Utah: Wyoming Geological Association, Oil and Gas Fields Symposium, Greater Green River Basin, p. 72–73.
Review: Michael Vanden Berg, Grant Willis, David Tabet, Michael Hylland, Kimm Harty, and Rick Allis (all with Utah Geological Survey), and Bradley Hill, Dayne Doucet, Don Staley, Dustin Doucet, Joshua Payne (all with Utah Division of Oil, Gas, and Mining).
Publication Review: Vicky Clarke and Jay Hill (Utah Geological Survey)
Description: This digital dataset presents the oil and gas fields of Utah at a 1:700,000 scale. The Uinta and Paradox Basins in eastern and southeastern Utah, respectively, produce the majority of the hydrocarbons in the state. The map also shows major basins and uplifts, national parks, monuments, and recreation areas, township and range, counties, major cities, major roads, major water bodies, Precambrian rocks, Tertiary and Quaternary volcanic rocks and intrusions, the eastern extent of Sevier orogenic thrusting, and pipelines. The oil and gas field polygons are colored by the age of the major producing reservoir. Field names are colored by commodity produced (red for gas, green for oil, and purple for CO2). Beneath each field label are listed the producing reservoir rocks, field designations, and reservoir designations. Any designations listed after reservoirs are applicable only to the afore-written reservoir. For example, the Lodgepole field polygon in Summit County is colored green for Jurassic, and the field label is also green, designating an oil field. Beneath the name “Lodgepole” is listed “(D) (HD) Jtc, Jn (A)” and from this we understand Lodgepole field has a produced water disposal project and horizontal drilling, is currently producing from the Jurassic Twin Creek Limestone and used to produce from the now-abandoned Jurassic Nugget Sandstone. The oil and gas pipelines are colored according to the products they transport (green for crude oil, red for natural gas, purple for CO2, and brown for refined products). Labels along the pipeline have an acronym referring the current operator, the diameter of the line, and direction of flow. This CD contains geographic information system (GIS) fields in an Environmental Systems Research Institute (Esri) file geodatabase and shapefile formats. A Portable Document Format (PDF) of the map is also included and requires Adobe Reader to view which can be downloaded at www.adobe.com. Specialized GIS software is required to use the GIS files.
Copyright Text: Utah Automated Geographic Reference Center (AGRC) http://agrc.utah.gov/
Plains All American Pipeline, LP
Bon, R.L., 1999, Petroleum geology of the Harley Dome field, Grand County, Utah: Utah Geological Survey Oil and Gas Field Studies 21, 2 plates.
Chidsey, T.C., Jr., Wakefield, S., Hill, B.G., and Hebertson, M., 2005, Oil and gas fields map of Utah: Utah Geological Survey Map 203DM, scale 1:700,000.
Fassett, J.E., editor, 1978, Oil and gas fields of the Four Corners area: Four Corners Geological Society, v. 2, p. 169–724.
Fassett, J.E., editor, 1983, Oil and gas fields of the Four Corners area: Four Corners Geological Society, v. 3, p. 1061–1140.
Gurgel, K.D., 1983, Energy resources map of Utah: Utah Geological and Mineral Survey Map 68, scale 1:500,000.
Hill, B.G., and Bereskin, S.R., editors, 1993, Oil and gas fields of Utah: Utah Geological Association Publication 22, non-paginated.
Hill, B.G., and Bereskin, S.R., editors, 1996, Oil and gas fields of Utah: Utah Geological Association Publication 22 (Addendum), non-paginated.
Hintze, L.F., Willis, G.C., Laes, D.Y.M., Sprinkel, D.A., and Brown, K.D., 2000, Digital geologic map of Utah: Utah Geological Survey Map 179DM, scale 1:500,000.
Hjellming, C.A., editor, 1993, Atlas of major Rocky Mountain gas reservoirs: New Mexico Bureau of Mines and Mineral Resources, 206 p., 10 plates.
Morgan, C.D., 1999, Petroleum geology of the Cisco Dome area, Grand County, Utah: Utah Geological Survey Oil and Gas Field Studies 19, 4 plates.
Morgan, C.D., 1999, Petroleum geology of the Cisco Townsite and Cisco Wash areas, Grand County, Utah: Utah Geological Survey Oil and Gas Field Studies 22, 2 plates.
Morgan, C.D., 2001, Petroleum geology of the Agate, Danish Wash, Sage, and Sieber Nose reservoirs in the Greater Cisco field, Grand County, Utah: Utah Geological Survey Oil and Gas Field Studies 23, 2 plates.
Morgan, C.D., 2005, Clay Basin gas field, Daggett County, Utah, in Dehler, C.M., Pederson, J.L., Sprinkel, D.A., and Kowallis, B.J., editors, Uinta Mountains geology: Utah Geological Association Publication 33, p. 337–345.
Morgan, C.D., 2007, Structure, reservoir characterization, and carbon dioxide resources of Farnham Dome field, Carbon County, Utah, in Willis, G.C., Hylland, M.D., Clark, D.L., and Chidsey, T.C., Jr., editors, Central Utah — diverse geology of a dynamic landscape: Utah Geological Association Publication 36, p. 297–310.
Preston, D., editor, 1961, Oil and gas fields of Utah: Intermountain Association of Petroleum Geologists, non-paginated.
Stewart, W.W., 1979, Clay Basin, Daggett County, Utah: Wyoming Geological Association, Oil and Gas Fields Symposium, Greater Green River Basin, p. 100–101.
Stowe, C., 1972, Oil and gas production in Utah to 1970: Utah Geological and Mineral Survey Bulletin 94, 179 p.
Utah Division of Oil, Gas, and Mining, 2015, Oil and gas well logs: Online, http://oilgas.ogm.utah.gov/Data_Center/LiveData_Search/well_data_lookup.cfm, accessed March 2015.
Utah Division of Oil, Gas, and Mining, 2015, Oil and gas production data by field: Online, https://oilgas.ogm.utah.gov/pub/Publications/Reports/Prod/Field/Fld_Dec_2014.pdf, accessed March 2015.
Utah Division of Oil, Gas, and Mining, 2015, Oil and gas production data by well: Online, https://oilgas.ogm.utah.gov/pub/Publications/Reports/Prod/Well/Wel_Dec_2014.pdf, accessed March 2015.
Utah Geological Survey, 2013, Utah oil and gas — a rich history, a powerful future: Utah Geological Survey Public Information Series 71, 21 p.
Vanden Berg, M.D., 2014, Utah’s energy landscape: Utah Geological Survey Circular 117, 45 p.
Westerdale, B., 1979, Bridger Lake, Summit County, Utah: Wyoming Geological Association, Oil and Gas Fields Symposium, Greater Green River Basin, p. 72–73.
Review: Michael Vanden Berg, Grant Willis, David Tabet, Michael Hylland, Kimm Harty, and Rick Allis (all with Utah Geological Survey), and Bradley Hill, Dayne Doucet, Don Staley, Dustin Doucet, Joshua Payne (all with Utah Division of Oil, Gas, and Mining).
Publication Review: Vicky Clarke and Jay Hill (Utah Geological Survey)
{"renderer":{"type":"uniqueValue","field1":"SdvOutput1_txt_FrmlndCls","field2":null,"field3":null,"defaultSymbol":null,"defaultLabel":null,"uniqueValueInfos":[{"symbol":{"type":"esriSFS","style":"esriSFSSolid","color":[255,0,197,255],"outline":{"type":"esriSLS","style":"esriSLSSolid","color":[0,0,0,0],"width":0.4}},"value":"All areas are prime farmland","label":"All areas are prime farmland","description":""},{"symbol":{"type":"esriSFS","style":"esriSFSSolid","color":[0,169,230,255],"outline":{"type":"esriSLS","style":"esriSLSSolid","color":[0,0,0,0],"width":0.4}},"value":"Farmland of statewide importance","label":"Farmland of statewide importance","description":""},{"symbol":{"type":"esriSFS","style":"esriSFSSolid","color":[215,215,158,255],"outline":{"type":"esriSLS","style":"esriSLSSolid","color":[0,0,0,0],"width":0.4}},"value":"Not prime farmland","label":"Not prime farmland","description":""},{"symbol":{"type":"esriSFS","style":"esriSFSSolid","color":[0,230,169,255],"outline":{"type":"esriSLS","style":"esriSLSSolid","color":[0,0,0,0],"width":0.4}},"value":"Prime farmland if irrigated","label":"Prime farmland if irrigated","description":""},{"symbol":{"type":"esriSFS","style":"esriSFSSolid","color":[255,170,0,255],"outline":{"type":"esriSLS","style":"esriSLSSolid","color":[0,0,0,0],"width":0.4}},"value":"Prime farmland if irrigated and the product of I (soil erodibility) x C (climate factor) does not exceed 60","label":"Prime farmland if irrigated and the product of I (soil erodibility) x C (climate factor) does not exceed 60","description":""},{"symbol":{"type":"esriSFS","style":"esriSFSSolid","color":[255,255,255,255],"outline":{"type":"esriSLS","style":"esriSLSSolid","color":[0,0,0,0],"width":0.4}},"value":"Not mapped/not available","label":"Not mapped/not available","description":""}],"fieldDelimiter":","},"transparency":0,"labelingInfo":null}
HasZ: false
HasM: false
Has Attachments: false
Has Geometry Properties: true
HTML Popup Type: esriServerHTMLPopupTypeAsHTMLText
ID: All areas are prime farmland
Name: All areas are prime farmland
Domains:
Templates:
Name: All areas are prime farmland
Description:
Drawing Tool: esriFeatureEditToolPolygon
Prototype:
Attributes:
SdvOutput1_txt_FrmlndCls: All areas are prime farmland
ID: Farmland of statewide importance
Name: Farmland of statewide importance
Domains:
Templates:
Name: Farmland of statewide importance
Description:
Drawing Tool: esriFeatureEditToolPolygon
Prototype:
Attributes:
SdvOutput1_txt_FrmlndCls: Farmland of statewide importance
ID: Not prime farmland
Name: Not prime farmland
Domains:
Templates:
Name: Not prime farmland
Description:
Drawing Tool: esriFeatureEditToolPolygon
Prototype:
Attributes:
SdvOutput1_txt_FrmlndCls: Not prime farmland
ID: Prime farmland if irrigated
Name: Prime farmland if irrigated
Domains:
Templates:
Name: Prime farmland if irrigated
Description:
Drawing Tool: esriFeatureEditToolPolygon
Prototype:
Attributes:
SdvOutput1_txt_FrmlndCls: Prime farmland if irrigated
ID: Prime farmland if irrigated and the product of I (soil erodibility) x C (climate factor) does not exceed 60
Name: Prime farmland if irrigated and the product of I (soil erodibility) x C (climate factor) does not exceed 60
Domains:
Templates:
Name: Prime farmland if irrigated and the product of I (soil erodibility) x C (climate factor) does not exceed 60
Description:
Drawing Tool: esriFeatureEditToolPolygon
Prototype:
Attributes:
SdvOutput1_txt_FrmlndCls: Prime farmland if irrigated and the product of I (soil erodibility) x C (climate factor) does not exceed 60
ID: Not mapped/not available
Name: Not mapped/not available
Domains:
Templates:
Name: Not mapped/not available
Description:
Drawing Tool: esriFeatureEditToolPolygon
Prototype:
Attributes:
SdvOutput1_txt_FrmlndCls: Not mapped/not available